"If we're going to add people and we're
going to expand the program, it's more appropriate to do it during the
budget, not a supplemental,' House Minority Leader Brian DelGrosso,
R-Loveland, said. 'I think that is a department that the numbers may
fluctuate."
Further, Sloan (the head of the CBI) has a problem with arithmetic. Back in 2013 before the gunonwer control laws were passed, the CBI had trouble keeping up with background checks.
wait times were well over 9 days at one point. Finally CBI re-allocated
some staff to reduce the backlog, but it always seemed to me that the
long waits had more to do with Sloan wanting to use them as an excuse to
increase his budget than them merely being overwhelmed. His
comprehension seems questionable as well, judging from his inability to answer a question about a law he supports and would oversee enforcement of.
Back
to the Gazette article, with the appearance of deceptive practices by
the CBI's head, I find this next quote to be plausible:
"DelGrosso said the denial of funds shows the agency was not convincing in the need for the mid-fiscal year budget increase."
So perhaps the budget committee used calculators when Sloan was speaking?
"Traditionally, when the House and
Senate cannot agree on a final version of a bill a temporary committee
is formed to hash out the issue and find a middle ground.
On this issue, however, Senate Republicans adhered to their original version and sent the bill back to the House to either be approved without the background check appropriation or the entire bill would die."
That's promising.
The Durango Herald also covers this story:
On this issue, however, Senate Republicans adhered to their original version and sent the bill back to the House to either be approved without the background check appropriation or the entire bill would die."
That's promising.
The Durango Herald also covers this story:
"The current wait time is about 54 days on background checks. The
additional money aimed to lower that time to about 20 days. Wait times
are expected to increase past 54 days without the funding. Colorado law
requires permits to be issued without a background check if the wait
time crawls past 90 days."
54 days? 54? To get permission to exercise a Right? And Sloan's request for more
funds would only cut that wait to 20 days? I'd assume that's 20 business days, mind you. 54 days is 77,760 minutes to wait on something that should be instantaneous if it is to be tolerated at all.
"But Sen. Kent Lambert, R-Colorado Springs,
chairman of the JBC, said some of the blame should be placed on the CBI.
He also suggested that Colorado should adopt a different
concealed-carry background check law that models one used by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, which Lambert said would reduce wait times to
one day.
'I believe the request at this time is superfluous and unnecessary,' Lambert said."
So it may not be that the GoP has a problem with
the concept of background checks 9much to their discredit), it could be
that they think that waiting 20 days, or 54 days, or more than one is
ridiculous.
No comments:
Post a Comment